A Primer on (Market) Equity linked GICs

As seen in an earlier post, traditional GICs offer security of principal with a low rate of return (in the current interest environment) for locking in the money for set time periods. The longer the term, the better the rate offered. Callable GICs provide a better rate than traditional GICs to compensate for the risk that the issuer retains an option to call the GIC after a set time period. Another type of GIC that is available is the equity-linked GIC, which we will discuss in detail below.

The Return

As the name suggests, an equity-linked GIC offers an investment return based upon the performance of a major equity index such as S&P/TSX 60 Index, S&P 500, or a weighted basket of international stock market indices. Such a GIC offers principal protection, while providing the opportunity for potentially higher returns than a traditional GIC. However, the return of an equity-linked GIC is variable as it depends on the performance of the underlying stock market index.

Equity-linked vs. Traditional GICs

As with other investment vehicles, the risk versus reward profile is applicable to equity-linked GICs also. These GICs seem to offer the best of both worlds – security of the investment and potential for higher returns. Nonetheless, in the event of the underlying equity index performing poorly, the GIC may not pay any interest upon maturity. So, the investor would receive his principal “as is”, while inflation may have eroded the purchasing power of that amount. Depending on the amount invested and term of the GIC, the erosion may be significant.

Let us consider an example to understand the impact better. Investor A has $1000 in an S&P 500-linked GIC for a term of 3 years, while Investor B has $25,000 in the same GIC for the same term of 3 years. Unfortunately, due to global crises, all equity markets, including the S&P 500 Index, perform poorly over the next 3 years. Both investors will receive their principal amounts back ($1000 for A and $25,000 for B) without any interest paid at maturity. What are their initial investment amounts worth after 3 years (i.e., upon maturity), if the annual rate of inflation remained constant at 2.5%? Investor A is left with $928.60 and Investor B has $23,214.99 in real dollars after accounting for inflation.

The above examples may portray equity-linked GICs in poor light, while making traditional GICs seem better. Traditional GICs offer a guaranteed rate of interest, albeit low, to aid in mitigating the impact of inflation. However, there is no chance to partake in stock market gains, if they happen. The bottom line is that both GICs face the threat of losing purchasing power to inflation. It is the responsibility of every investor to weigh the opportunity cost and decide if they prefer the low but guaranteed interest rate of the traditional GIC or the potential for higher returns offered by the equity-linked GIC, while running the risk of receiving no interest at the end of the term.

Typically, money invested in equity-linked GICs cannot be accessed until maturity. This is in contrast to most traditional GICs, where the funds can be withdrawn by paying a penalty in the form of a reduced interest rate or no interest receivable (for very short terms).

Editors Note – Market Linked GIC Downsides

  • Market returns are based on a participation rate.  Basically, this means that if the market does gain over the term, you will only be paid a portion of those gains.
  • From what I can gather, market returns on these products do NOT include dividends, which can be a large portion of market returns.

Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC)

CDIC insures investments ranging from $1 to $100,000. Investments could be in savings/chequing accounts, GICs, and other term deposits with a date to maturity of 5 years or less. So, equity-linked GICs with terms less than 5 years are eligible to be insured by the CDIC. However, please be aware that investments including GICs held at credit unions are not backed by the CDIC but insured by respective provincial bodies.

Are equity-linked GICs suitable for a portfolio?

As with any stock market investment vehicle (e.g. individual stocks, mutual funds, or ETFs), an investor with a long investment time horizon (several years) can consider holding an equity-linked GIC in their portfolio. Conversely, if an investor is using GICs as a short-term parking spot for money to be used as the down payment on a house, for a car, new furniture, etc., then it would be prudent to use traditional GICs or a savings account. As always, read the features and benefits section of the investment vehicle before committing your money.

Do you hold equity-linked GICs? What is your investment time frame? Did your decision to buy such GICs turn out to be fruitful?

About the Author: Clark works in Saskatchewan and has been working to build his (DIY) investment portfolio, structured for an early retirement. He loves reading (and using the lessons learned) about personal finance, technology and minimalism.  You can read his other articles here.

I've Completed My Million Dollar Journey. Let Me Guide You Through Yours!

Sign up below to get a copy of our free eBook: Can I Retire Yet?

Posted in


Clark works in Saskatchewan and has been working to build his (DIY) investment portfolio, structured for an early retirement. He loves reading (and using the lessons learned) about personal finance, technology and minimalism. You can read his other articles here.
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
9 years ago

: “invested in the market by itself” HOW exactly?

Frugal Trader
9 years ago

@DJ, if you were invested in the market by itself, you would have returned 60%+ not including dividends over the three year period.

I will make a couple additions to the article.

9 years ago

I agree with Anthony – not mentioning that dividends are NOT paid by market-linked GICs when that can be a sizeable amount of the return each year is irresponsible. Suggest updating the main post for those who don’t read the comments.

9 years ago

Does anyone have a good link to “typical” terms for these equity-linked GICs? Also, how short a period can you get them for? As the period shortens it seems even more “heads I win, tails you lose” from the investor’s perspective – I can’t see how any entity could write such a contract without charging an options-like premium.

9 years ago

I just had a market linked GIC cashed in friday….. 20% return for 3 years..i think timing was important since i got it right after the markets crashed..but it returned more than my stocks did in the last 3 years with 0 risk and a 2.5%/yr minimum return.

Ron @ High School Life
9 years ago

Thanks for sharing this great post! You know how much my savings account is payin in interst? .1%. Pathetic.

9 years ago

I think that what people need to realize is that there is no free lunch… it is as simple as that. As soon as people understand the concept of opportunity cost… the picture gets a little clearer

9 years ago

@Ed: Appreciate the better insight and details about the method of calculation.

@Anthony: Agree that the points you have raised are important that I should have at least touched upon them. Thanks for the thoughts!

9 years ago

no risk no reward…. plain and simple. If you want to be in the market then… be in the market. If you don’t understand the basic correlation of more reward requires more risk then you shouldn’t even be anywhere near market based investments. The 1% “fear premium” IMO on a seg fund is easy money for an insurance company for exactly the reasons Ed mentioned. For most people concerned about the “guarantees” the are actually more concerned about cash flow… they just don’t know it. A conservative market approach has the same amount of risk as a GIC, the risks are just different…

Ed Rempel
9 years ago

Hi Anthony,

I agree with your assessment. Personally, I would not buy one.

Guarantees are always expensive. You have to understand the cost of any guarantee.

A far better option to get the gain of the stock market with a principal guarantee would be seg funds. You can get 100% of the growth including dividends and have it taxed as capital gains, plus you can get a principal guarantee after 10 years.

Seg funds are a much better choice than index-linked GICs.

However, seg funds also come with a higher cost, say .5-1% higher than the same investment without the guarantee.

If you look at how rarely the stock market is down after 10 years, you realize the cost is probably not worth it, except for some clients for emotional reasons.

Here are the stats. The worst 10-year period ever for the S&P500 was a loss of 1.47%/year. This was 1999-2008. The second worst was a loss of 1.40%/year from 1929-38. In total, there have been four 10-year periods that have been negative, out of 132 10-year periods on record.

In short, historically, there has been only a 3.0% chance of a loss over 10 years and all of them were small. Paying .5-1%/year to protect against this is not worth it, except possibly for purely emotional reasons.

My opinion – if you want to make an equity return, then you need to be willing to accept the volatility. If you want guarantees, make sure you always understand the full cost. Guarantees are almost always extremely expensive.