Are hybrid vehicles worth it?  With record high gas prices due to the price of oil, I’m sure that most car owners out there have major concerns over their gas usage. Over the past 10 years, the cost of gasoline has grown 250%!

This got me thinking, with the newer “gas friendly” hybrid cars/SUV’s out there now, do the premiums attached to their price tags justify to extra mileage that you get? I did a little digging around the various car manufacturer websites to see the pricing of hybrids vs their gasoline versions and whether or not the gas savings added up.

From my research, this is the information that I dug up. Below is a table comparing some popular hybrids with their gasoline counterparts. The table calculates how long it would take the gas savings of a hybrid to pay for the difference in purchase price from their gasoline sibling.

Some notes about the data:

  • The costs are the purchase price after taxes/levies/fees and with the ecoRebate applied if applicable.
  • The comparison does not account for the extra maintenance cost (or depreciation) of the hybrids.
  • Assumes the gasoline price of $1.30/L or around $4.91/gallon.
  • The comparison is based on financial differences only and does not evaluate the “green” benefits.

Hybrid vs. Gasoline Vehicle Comparison

Car Cost Difference City L/100km HW L /100km AVG L/100km L / year Gas $/yr yrs to payback
Civic LX $25,170 8.2 5.7 6.95 1390 $1,807
Civic Hybrid $29,200 $4,030 4.7 4.3 4.5 900 $1,170 6.33
Corolla LE $24,665 7.4 5.6 6.5 1300 $1,690
Prius $32,866 $8,201 4 4.2 4.1 820 $1,066 13.14
Ford Escape (fwd) $30,226 10.3 7.7 9 1800 $2,340
Escape Hybrid $35,119 $4,893 5.7 6.7 6.2 1240 $1,612 6.72
Camry LE $30798 9.5 6.2 7.85 1570 2041
Camry Hybrid $36191 $5,393 5.7 5.7 5.7 1140 1482 9.65

It seems that the best “value” out of the bunch is the Honda Civic Hybrid which would take over 6 years for the gas savings to make up for the difference in cost. Even though the Prius claims the best fuel mileage, it’s the worst value of the bunch. The Prius would take over 13 years to pay for it’s premium, that’s 13 years too long for me. With all the extra electronics involved with a Hybrid, it’s also bound to have extra maintenance costs also, which is not accounted for.

Out of the vehicles compared, the price premium attached to the hybrid vehicles are just too great to be considered a cost savings relative to purchasing their gasoline counterpart. In order for me to even consider a Hybrid, their prices would have to come down to the level of their gasoline competition.

What are your thoughts on hybrid vehicles?

If you’re considering purchasing a Hybrid, or any car for that matter, check out my car buying negotiation tips.

Welcome StumbleUpon Visitor! If you enjoyed this article, please take a second of your time to give it a “thumbs up”. Thanks!

If you would like to read more articles like this, you can sign up for my free weekly money tips newsletter below (we will never spam you).


  1. The Financial Blogger on June 9, 2008 at 7:12 am

    It doesn’t seem to be a great deal after all!
    Even with the Civic or the Escape (6 and 7 years or recuperations), chances are that you will have reached over 100,000 km with your car and I am sure that dealership would charge “extra” maintenance fee when you do your inspection and repairs. Therefore, you probably would have to add another year to your recuperation cost.

    Since this technology is still evolving, I guess that the depreciation would be bigger as the energy efficiency increase.

    I wish they could do hybrid or electric car at a cheaper cost or that is more energy efficient so you can get your money back.

  2. Al on June 9, 2008 at 9:53 am

    I’ve wondered about the benefit of having a small motorcycle or scooter as a means of saving on the cost of fuel. The stipulation is that I can’t get rid of the car because of winter and the need to move stuff sometimes.

    So, it’s the savings in fuel against the cost of the bike, maintenance, licensing and insurance. Insurance (the big cost) runs about $400 per year for an experienced rider on a low CC bike, and say another $100 for everything else giving a total cost of $500 per year. With a riding season of around 30 weeks in Ottawa, you’d have to save around $17/week on fuel.

    This doesn’t seem to bad except that the start up costs are really high. Insurance is about double at the beginning and takes a few years to come down. There are several tests (didn’t cost this out) and it sounds like it is a good idea to take a course as well. As a non-rider, the upfront costs make it inpractical to go this route. It would be nice to see some initiatives to lower these costs and make this environmental choice more economical too.

  3. AndyS on June 9, 2008 at 11:14 am

    Great analysis. I think choosing your car should first depend on how much you expect to commute over the next 3-5 yeras AND how long you plan to keep your car (I like to get a new or upgraded car every 5 years). Given paybacks of hybrids ar more than 6 years, it would be hard for me to justify purchasing one right now. However with the price of oil going up so fast, hybrids will start get mass produced by all manufatcturers sooner rather than later. This will bring prices down and change the cost/benefit ratio. I wrote a recent post on wheter a car is a liability or an asset – – and this would be an interesting evaluation for this question.

  4. Personal Tax & Financial Planning on June 9, 2008 at 11:26 am

    I was going to blog the same topic but you beat me to the punch ;)

    My current plan with my 1998 Escort is to drive the thing until either it costs more to fix it than to buy a new one or it dies altogether. I think I can get another 2-3 years out the beast (it already has 215,000 km on it). If I can reliably get 12-13 years out of my existing car and the technology is proven is it reasonable to assume a hybrid will last as long? What are the maintenance costs?

  5. A Hybrid Owner on June 9, 2008 at 11:59 am

    Talk to real hybrid owners sometime. Your flawed research yields faulty conclusion. Prices for hybrids you quoted are way off base, at least for the models I’m familiar with.

    Here’s one hybrid owners experience at 3 years ->

  6. Daniel on June 9, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    I have a Toyota that is almost paid-off and in great condition. The gas millage is adequate and my wife and I are using our bicycles in good weather so the high price of gas has not had a huge effect on our budget yet.

    But next year when we build our new house we will need a 2nd vehicle. I also looked at the hybrids but I do not like the high costs associated with the “gas savings”.

    The other option is the Zenn car. They plan to introduce a highway capable electric car in 2009. I would really consider this option.

  7. nobleea on June 9, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    Whoops, just deleted my well thought out comment.

    Here it is again, condensed.

    Civic hybrid gets over 60 mpg in city and hwy, very impressive. Is the LX more comparable to the hybrid options? You can get a civic base for under 20K all in.

    The Prius is a roomy car. It falls somewhere between the camry and corolla, so comparing it to a corolla is probably not fair.

    The other thing to consider is that hybrids sell for close to MSRP, while regular cars can be negotiated for a discount. This would worsen the payback time.

    I’m sure you could pop up a graph with gas price versus payoff, as some of us are already paying more than $1.30 a litre.

    The Zenn car is good (but you have to consider the potential for electricity to increase in price too) and that trike they are selling now (classified as a car, not a bike I think).

  8. Curt on June 9, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    How about the new Aptera?

    The years to payback is about 5 years. The biggest limitation is that they are only selling in California.

  9. Flora on June 9, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    I see the Hybrid thing to be a capital vs operating costs scenario:

    If one is to spend 35k capital on a car, then the Prius is a great option because it’s operating cost from Day1 will be lower than all other 35k cars. If one is going to spend 25k, then the Prius would not be an option. It’s not fair to compare the pay back time using Corolla as a base case because a Corolla buyer wasn’t going to buy a Prius. A corolla buyer would, however, potentially be interested in a Civic hybrid due to the less price difference.

    Honda is to come up with a new subcompact and hopefully economical hybrid next year. That will be addressed to those in the mid to low 20k range car-shoppers.

  10. FrugalTrader on June 9, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    Note guys that the prices quoted are Canadian prices which are usually higher than what it would cost to buy in the U.S.

    Anyone know anything about the Aptera? I cannot imagine driving one of those things in the snow. :)

    Nobleea, yes, I chose the model car that best resembles the hybrid version. I didn’t know that the Prius was actually fairly roomy. I would figure that they were comparable to the new Corollas as they seem a bit larger as well.

  11. Mike M on June 9, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    My comment was deleted, too! Annoying…

    The Prius is classified as a midsize car, not a compact car. The closest comparison is the Camry LE, not the Corolla LE. It has 96 cubic feet if interior space, vs 86 for the Corolla and 100 for the Camry.

    Using the numbers from the graph above to do a comparison to the Camry, the difference in price is $2068, the difference in gas is $975, leaving a payback period of 2.12 years.

    Hybrids depreciate LESS than normal cars, and the maintenance costs are not any higher. I bought by hybrid for $2000 under MSRP, so it can be done. Gas prices will always go up, shortening the payback period.

    This is a serious question…Does anyone out there actually buy a car based on a careful financial analysis of gas price payback of one model vs another? If you buy a Chevy Tahoe, do you feel the need to “justify” the purchase? Why should the same apply to hybrids? Buy the car you want to buy.

    Then there are the green reasons…

  12. Telly on June 9, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    I’ve oftened considered a hybrid but my current small car keeps ticking so I’ll wait. My personal reasons for wanting to buy a hybrid was never that it would necessarily save money over the non-hybrid version, but rather, I like the idea of supporting the technology. Maybe it’s the geeky engineer in me.

    Hybrids are expensive because they are fairly new technology. As more of them are sold, the price should come down and the engineering should be improved (especially things like battery life). Development costs on a hybrid are significantly higher than your standard vehicle.

  13. David@The Good Human on June 9, 2008 at 1:32 pm

    If you are not counting in the “green” aspect, you are leaving out a lot of the “worth” of the car, which sways any results based only on cost. Half the car’s reason for being is to be “green”…

  14. MikeG on June 9, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    I used to have a 1990 prelude and now have a 2007 corolla CE, the purchase was almost a no brainer for me because
    A) The corolla would “pay” for itself in 6 years by fuel efficiency
    and b) the 2007 corolla is almost certainly more reliable than my 18yr old car.

    Hows this for fuel efficiency:

    Cycling to and from work burns about 1450 calories, or about $1.40 if I eat it as pasta. btw: this is 20kms ea. way. This takes me 2 hours 10 mins. total. Plus I have to maintain my bike, but I doubt it costs more than 60c per day. I also can cancel my gym membership ($40 a month) because Im exercising 2 hours a day now :).

    Driving to and from work @ about 25c/km (the estimated cost of my corolla) is about $10 and takes about 1 hour and 20 mins total.

    Busing to work is $5.00 per day and takes 2 hours.

    In reality, its way cheaper to just not own/need a car. If you can get away without a car, do it.. If you can get away with just 1 car in your family.. do it.
    Better for the environment, better for the wallet.


  15. Nicolas on June 9, 2008 at 2:07 pm

    As the prices quoted are for a cash purchases or a 0% financing, it would be interesting to calculate savings when you pay the car over a period of 2-3-4-5 years. Since hybrids are more expensive, the total price with interests would make for an even bigger payback number.

  16. FearLES on June 9, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    The Lemonaid book has a good right up on hybrids. Summary: not worth it.
    Hybrid Hype
    We don’t recommend electric and gasoline engine hybrids because their fuel economy can be 40 percent worse than the automakers report, their long-term reliability is unknown, battery replacement cost is estimated to run as high as $8,000 (U.S.), expensive electric motors are predicted to have a higfh failure rate from corrosion, their retail prices are incredibly high, and the potential resale value is no better than similar vehicles equipped with a conventional engine. For example, a 2001 Prius that originally sold for $29,990 is now valued at a disappointing $12,000 (and we’re only two years away from the expiration of that $8,000 battery warranty). Compare that to the price of a fully-equipped 2001 Camry CE V6, that sells for about $1,000 more–with no battery worries.

    Also don’t forget that money today is worth more than tomorrow (inflation) and that you could be investing those dollars.

    Better to buy a gas efficient and space efficient car like a Honda Fit (you have to see it to believe all the things that it can do).

  17. Finance_Addict on June 9, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    A few thoughts:

    Nobleea I would argue the Corolla is roomier than the Prius. I have a Corolla and my neighbor has the Prius. It’s a fair comparison.

    These comments I hear about taking the bus or bike just don’t cut for most due to weather, distance, kids, routes etc.

    Just buy a small gas car (corolla, yaris, echo, civic, smart, mini etc.) don’t drive to aggressive, hedge your gas bill by buying a oil\gas income trust and smile when you pull up beside those huge SUV’s.

    FT great job pointing out the raw deal on hybrids.

  18. Chuck on June 9, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Another fact to consider is the upward trend in gas prices.

    When I bought my matrix in 2005, a fillup was about $32. Now its $45. Should this trend continue you will have a much shorter payback on the hybrid.

    Also its not wholly apples to apples comparison. A lot of the hybrids also have trims and features that you cannot get in the gas-based model. For example the now-defunct Accord Hybrid was also the “fully loaded” Accord. Even for the camry the Hybrid is closer to the XLE v6 model than the LE in terms of features – and the XLE has an MSRP of 5k more than the Hybrid.

  19. Cow on June 9, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    I have to agree on noting that the upward trend in gas prices means it’s more likely to be an even shorter period–although 13 years on the Prius is still too long, imho.

    My primary vehicle is the Vancouver SkyTrain, which gets 0L/100km. :D

  20. PatMunits on June 9, 2008 at 3:45 pm

    FrugalTrader, please consider adding another column to the table: “kms to payback”. 20 KKm is an unrealistic number for tons of Canadians who now live in suburbs, and who are the first people to get concerned about rising refill costs. I put about 35,000 KMs annually and my commute is just 40 mins each way to work, which is not much at all by GTA standards.

    Re: motorbikes/scooter – I think that one’s existing life insurance would have to be reworked because riding a bike puts insured into a higher risk group. Thus higher premiums on life insurance take some of the gas saving benefits away too.

  21. James on June 9, 2008 at 4:12 pm

    Hybrids are not green. Its a common misconception. While from the day you drive them off the lot they are more green than a regular car the mining and transport of the car offsets the benefits. For some cars the metals in the batteries are mined in Canada, shipped to Europe then to Japan then shipped back to Canada once the car is built. That is a whole bunch of green house gasses emitted. There was a study done in the last year that looked at this. To get the most green friendly car you should drive one that was manufactured as close to where you live as possible with the best milage possible (non-hybrid).

  22. Mike on June 9, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    One thing to consider would be that hybrids will maintain a higher value over time – so if you may sell the car eventually, some of the extra cost vs. a gas vehicle will go back into your pocket. Money you spend on gas, on the other hand, is money thrown away!

  23. Tyler on June 9, 2008 at 5:13 pm

    This is useful information. One factor that isn’t accounted for is that the price of gas will likely go up.

  24. 45free on June 9, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    The big variable for me (outside of gas prices) as L/Yr. Your analysis assumes 20,000 KM’s per year. I actually put about 2.5 times that on my car in a year. That shaves the payback to 2.5 years on the Civic.

  25. Calvin on June 9, 2008 at 6:49 pm

    My understanding is that if you can still get your hands on a 2008 Civic Hybrid, you can qualify for $2000 from the Federal Government and $2000 from the Provincial government in Eco Rebates. That’s $4000 that would wipe the difference.

    I say IF you can still get your hands on one as I understand a lot of people were hoping to cash in on that rebate before it goes away.

  26. FrugalTrader on June 9, 2008 at 6:53 pm

    Calvin, do you have more information on the provincial ecorebates? All figures in the table account for the federal ecoRebate.

  27. Drew on June 9, 2008 at 6:56 pm

    I’m confused. You show the Toyota Prius priced at nearly $33,000. I paid $24,000 for mine last September (including mid range accessories). Prius does not come in a non-hybrid version, so i don’t understand the “comparison” column listing for it. My average mileage (city and highway combination) is about 47 miles to the gallon. It’s probably about 50 mpg in the city and closer to 40 mpg on the highway (where it uses only its gasoline engine.) My wife and I are very pleased with the car, which has plenty of power, excellent maneuverability and a whole raft of special features (keyless electronic entry and startup, touch screen control of radio and a/c, backupcamera) It is remarkably roomy and comfortable.

    So whoever concocted the ratings regarding the Prius above seems to have pulled them out of the air.

  28. Cash Instinct on June 9, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    Drew: Are you American or Canadian?

    Prices shown in the article are probably Canadian prices, and you can be sure that Canadians pay more for the same cars compared to the price paid by an American.

  29. Potato on June 9, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    I went through a similar analysis starting last year as I’m shopping around for cars to replace my ’97 Accord, and figured the Prius, Camry Hybrid and Civic Hybrid were close enough in value to let other factors (emissions, fear of rising gas prices, technocoolness) sway the decision. Then the federal rebates got added in and it seemed to be a slam dunk in my reckoning.

    So to reiterate a few points already made above, I also had the provincial PST rebates included. For Ontario, that’s a $2000 rebate of the PST paid on the car (new or used or imported from the states). If you have a valuable trade-in and pay less PST, you will get only up to as much PST as you paid (the Federal ecoauto rebate is $2000 for the Prius and HCH and is not tied to the GST even though some news reports call it a GST rebate). I believe BC ($2k-4k, depending on age of trade-in), QC ($2k?), MB ($2k) and PEI ($1k?) also have provincial rebates.

    I compared the Prius to the Accord LX w/ auto trans (I could have used the Camry, but honestly if I was to go with a non-hybrid mid-sized, I would probably choose the Accord again). The Prius kind of falls in between the Corolla and Camry for size, but I really thought it was more comparable to the Camry (it’s narrower, but you have even more rear leg room than even the Camry, so it’s a way more comfortable fit for 4 adults than a Corolla).

    Whether or not there’s an additional difference with “actual” price between cars is a good question. Last year when I was shopping, the Civic Hybrid, Prius, Accord, and Civic LX all had comparable discounts via APA pre-negotiated pricing. After the current gas shock now though, the hybrids may be an MSRP-only vehicle due to demand.

    I assumed gas would very shortly be at $1/L (and how shortly it was!) and would rise 10 cents/year for 10 years of ownership — rather than looking at length of payback time, I looked at how much money I would have after 10 years of ownership. I of course thought that would be a pretty realistic estimate for the increase in gas prices, but it might have been too conservative seeing where we are just a year later! The reason I wanted to see how much I would have saved is that I worried that the skeptics might be right, and the battery system would need replacement at $3000 after 10 years. However, I found that there was a good chance that over that time, I’d have saved up about $3000 (beyond the initial “hybrid premium”) so if the battery did die, I could just buy one out of the gas savings. If it didn’t, I’d be way ahead. (Remember: the break-even time is one thing, but then you get to make that savings all over again every break-even period. If the break-even time is less than half the expected lifetime of the car, I figure it’s a sweet deal)

    The maintenance costs should about even out: the hybrids may require more expensive routine maintenance and repairs since one might only be comfortable going to a dealership rather than an independent shop; however, the hybrids have fewer wear items (the beauty of having enough electric power available to get rid of starter motors, to improve air conditioner compressors, electric power steering, etc) and also have vastly longer lasting brake pads due to regenerative braking.

    To some of the other comments: yes, hybrids don’t get their rated mileage. Neither, however, does any other car on the road unless driven exactly the way the mileage tests are conducted. It’s just that the hybrids have the big in-your-face instantaneous readouts so some people noticed and complained (ok, the hybrids do take a bigger proportional hit for <1km cold-start trips and winter stop-and-go driving… but take less of a proportional hit in stop-and-go heatwave city driving). For resale value, look at a 2004+ Prius or a 2006+ HCH; the 2001 Prius was a completely different car with first-generation technology. The current models are holding their resale value exceptionally well. At the very least, it is a fair assumption that the “hybrid premium” will be maintained and you can pass on the share of it to the next owner if you sell. #21: pure FUD. Every car is made with metals mined/refined at a great distance; bulk shipping is pretty cheap and fuel-efficient; it makes no impact relative to the fuel used during the car’s lifetime. Consider also the lead-acid battery in every car. Hybrids have tiny ones just to start the computers and run 12V loads when the car is off, but the engine and everything else is started off the high-voltage lifetime battery. Search for the threads on greenhybrid or priuschat for the calculations, but basically the Prius will use about 1/3 of the amount of lead over its lifetime and about the same amount of total battery metal as a pickup truck (but the nickel hybrid batteries are fully and profitably recyclable while the lead is less so).

    Finally, the comparison depends a lot on what type of driving you do — notice how vastly improved the hybrid city mileage can be. If you rack on the vast majority of your mileage in city driving (and stop-and-go rushhour commuting on the 401/DVP/QEW is city driving even if you’re technically on a highway ;) then that also skews the comparison towards the hybrids. If you’re thinking of buying a hybrid, then I suggest you figure out what your actual fuel consumption is like in your current vehicle, then see if you can find someone on Priuschat or greenhybrid or any other owner with a similar-ish commute/driving style and see what their real-world mileage is like.
    The Ontario tax credit
    BC tax credit now even better

  30. Sarlock on June 10, 2008 at 12:21 am

    This is based on 20,000 km/year, also. I drive about 12-15,000 km per year, so a hybrid certainly does not make economical sense even with gas prices so high.

    Fuel economy is significantly impacted by the type of driving you do, too. Hybrids perform better in the city than they do on the highway while a gas engine is the opposite. Given that many of the longer distance commuters (the ones who drive 20-30k or more per year) do a lot of highway miles, it may work out that a hybrid is rarely economically feasible for the average driver. For someone who does 20k of inner city driving, however, the hybrid may pay for itself very quickly.

    Great analysis, FT!

  31. Jon B on June 10, 2008 at 11:21 am

    There is a difference between being the right thing to do and being an economical thing to do. “IF everyone” converted to hybrids – autosales would increase, the recession would slow down or reverse, and we would see prices drop for fuel, and we would extend our supplies, andw we would not even think about drilling in ANWR for 6 months of fuel.

    ANWR is not the ANsWeR.

  32. Mr.Ed on June 10, 2008 at 3:31 pm

    With all the recent talk about gas prices, fuel economy, and hybrid cars, why not consider the VW tdi??? Seems it’s always forgotten. Although diesel fuel is more expensive than gas (right now), they get GREAT fuel economy. I have a 2000 VW Golf tdi and I can get 1100 km to a 60 L fuel tank city driving (~55mpg). Generally I can get ~5.6l / 100km. They’re zippy little cars, and roomy too. Not much HP (90hp) but loads of torque (115 ft/lbs). All the power you’ll ever need. Yes they are slightly more to buy, and maintain, but if fuel economy is what you want, check out the v-dubs. I wouldn’t trade mine for a smart car, or a hybrid any day!!!!

  33. BAMBAMVAN on June 10, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    I agree that diesel may be the best now, and diesel engines seem to “run forever”. Your spreadsheet has to include resale values or the up front cost is meaningless. A sensitivity analysis of gasoline price would also make the comparison more accurate, as gas prices have gone up over 50% in 4 years.

  34. Nicolas on June 10, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Mr. Ed, I’m all with you on the TDI. It’s the one I got and it’s great. Can’t wait for the next generation of TDI’s to come out.

  35. Slan on June 11, 2008 at 12:10 am

    No one seem to talk about insurances. How do they differ ?? When owning a car those recurrent cost can make a very big difference !

    (They dont have hybrids but try to compare a Hyundai to a Mazda/Toyota/Honda !)

  36. jb on June 11, 2008 at 11:57 am

    I had to buy a car just a few months ago. You’re analysis confirms that I made the right choice in buying a non-hybrid car.

    Consider the following:
    * Its easier to find a good one or two year old used non-hybrid, and save that much more money.
    * The least expensive non-hybrid car listed above was $24k, but its easy to find even a new car for much less than $24k.
    * There’s the time value of money issue. Since you pay so much more upfront for a hybrid, you either pay interest or lose liquidity and interest/earnings that you would have if you saved and invested that money.
    * Insurance and taxes are that much more. (Taxes are explicit in gas prices, but hidden in car purchase prices.)
    * Maintenance on a non-hybrid is cheaper.
    * Even if you plan to keep the car for 8-12 years, you’re pretty much screwed if something happens and the hybrid is totaled after 5 years. (Even if you still have collision insurance, the book value is bound to be worthless.)

    Just a few months ago, I bought a one-year-old Saturn Ion for just under $10k. Even though I drive roughly 30k miles/year, I’m pretty sure that was a good financial decision. (Of course, I could change my tune if gas prices multiply 3x again over the next 10 years.)

  37. deepali on June 11, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    I think the “green” factor (aka, externalities not being account for above) is important as well. Early investment in sustainable technologies might not seem economical right now, but as we approach the tipping point, it will be more beneficial (and cheaper) in the long run. And we really have to start thinking more long-term and less short-term.
    The investment in a hybrid is not just in terms of gas savings, it’s also planet savings. The planet might still be fine when I die, but it won’t be when your kids are my age.

    Of course, this assumes that most parents care about the legacy they leave for their kids. Sometimes I do wonder….

  38. childfreelife on June 11, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    Your estimate is good as long as gasoline settles around 4.91 per gallon and doesn’t continue to go up in price over the next few years quickly.

    A trade in of your old car could easily pay for the difference between the old car and the new car.

    However, I think that hydrogen is the future. We shouldn’t be using any fossil fuels in our cars.

  39. felix on June 11, 2008 at 2:45 pm

    One thing I noticed is the average efficiency column on the table is merely adding the highway efficiency to the city efficiency and divide the sum by 2. This means that you use your car as much on the highway as you are in a city. Generally, this isn’t true for most people, who spend most of their time driving in a city.

  40. R Bitrator on June 11, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    this reminds me of the smug episode on southpark, you treehuggers should be using the extra $4000 – $8000 for something a little more productive.

    Also no one seems to mention the $5000 battery replacement that you will need to do in 5 years – choke on that exhaust smoke.

  41. Martha Beddoe on June 11, 2008 at 9:38 pm

    Gee – we paid $23.5 for our Prius in 2005. The place we bought it from is listing its 2008’s at comparable prices. That should change your analysis somewhat.

    It is possible to convert this car to a “plug-in” vehicle, using aftermarket technology (and yes, it voids the warranty). Further into ownership, a conversion once the car is out from warranty could further impact the analysis.

    So far, maintenance costs are equivalent to a non-hybrid car; nothing too spectacular and we are up to 60K on the vehicle. Insuring it has not cost any more than a normal car.

    I noticed a bit of a**hattery above about the battery replacement supposedly needed in five years; well, the jury’s out on it still. Some of them seem to go for quite a bit longer than 5 years. Also, the battery is recyclable; most normal tailpipe smokers aren’t so much.

  42. Emily @ Taking Charge on June 12, 2008 at 11:16 am

    Yeah, several months ago I needed a new car, and I had just graduated college so my dad bought it for me. We had been really interested in a hybrid, , specifically a Prius, both for the lower amount of gas that would be used and the environmental aspect. But we talked to a family friend who used to work at Toyota and he said it would not be a good investment. He said at this point, hybrid cars are extremely expensive to fix if something in the hybrid system breaks. Also, he said we’d be paying so much extra up front for the hybrid over a regular car, it would take so long to pay off the difference, I actually wouldn’t be saving on gas. We looked at the Corolla but ended up going with a Saturn Ion, which was less expensive and much sleeker. I love it and have had no problems, and get pretty good mileage. Now that gas prices are getting so high, though, I’m considering getting a Vespa so I can use my car less.

  43. Irene on June 12, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    I wonder how you arrived at the cost of the gas per year? What’s the assumption on the price of gas per gallon?

  44. Bert on June 13, 2008 at 1:01 pm

    It gets somewhat worse if you factor in the investment income you could make from the cash savings at purchase. $5k invested at 5% over 6 years is an extra $1700 you would have to make up with gas savings

  45. OBD-II Trouble Codes on June 13, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    I realize there are already a number of comments on the Prius vs Corolla debate. I bought a new Prius a few months ago (I’m CDN so I paid the price you posted). I wouldn’t be caught driving a Corolla. It’s not a good fit for my values and it is smaller than the Prius. The hatch in the Prius makes a WORLD of difference in interior room. Let’s not forget the base Prius in Canada is $29,500, not $32K. Maybe it would be better to use that price in your comparison.

    It doesn’t appear that you took into account the $2,000 eco-auto rebate. As well, where I live SGI gives you a 20% rebate on your annual licensing/insurance. That’s a rebate available only to hybrid vehicle owners.

    The other issue I have with this comparison is the fact that no one buys a vehicle solely based on fuel economy. Sure I bought a Prius, the most fuel efficient car on the market. But I bought it because:
    – It’s a good fit for our family of 4
    – I support Toyota and their track record of hybrid technology development
    – $2,000 eco-auto rebate
    – It’s more environmentally friendly than regular gas cars
    – Features, features, features! Auto climate control, Smart Key System, Homelink garage door opener, etc., etc.
    – Toyota quality reputation
    – Oh yeah, the good fuel economy :-)

    Don’t take my rant personally, it’s not meant to be an attack toward you. I am bugged by the number of people that compare the Prius to vehicles not in the same class. IMHO the only car you can truly compare the Prius to is the Civic hybrid. All other comparisons are not apples-to-apples.

    Maybe you should crunch the numbers again using $1.399/L gas (that’s $5.29/gallon for you US folks). That’s what it is now.

    • FrugalTrader on June 13, 2008 at 2:23 pm

      OBD, all prices include taxes/fees straight from the Toyota website. The $2k ecorebate was then subtracted from the total. The article was not meant to compare every feature, it was simply meant to see if the gas savings of a hybrid is worth the extra cost. I agree that the prius compared to the corolla may not be a 100% fair comparison, but it was the closest that I could find.

      Yes, as mentioned above, if gas prices increase dramatically, the hybrid camp will become more appealing.

  46. Aleks on June 13, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    As far as I’m concerned, hybrids are an unnecessary intermediary step between gas cars and whatever comes next. Not only is it a new, untested and unreliable technology that will be more expensive to maintain, but it’s unlikely to last long enough to get all the bugs worked out.

    On top of that, it’s only a “green” solution if your analysis ignores everything except the fuel burned in the car. Batteries are incredibly harmful to the environment and require a tremendous amount of energy to make, energy that currently comes from fossil fuels. And when those batteries die after five or ten years, they have to be disposed of.

    The hybrid craze is similar to the push for ethanol in gasoline. It only makes sense if your environmental impact analysis ignores the majority of the supply chain. CO2 emissions are only one pollutant, ignoring the rest is myopic.

  47. Tim on June 14, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    The other aspect of hybrids is the engine automatically shuts off whenever the car stops its forward motion. If you live a city like I do, you spend a lot of traffic time stopped at red lights, etc. I think you’d have to factor an extra 2-4% over standard automobiles to account for savings due to idling.

  48. nobleea on June 14, 2008 at 1:07 pm

    It’s quite easy to shut your regular gas engine off at lights. I do it for all lights/stops over 10 seconds. That’s the breakeven point for newer vehicles.

    It shocks me that people continue to let their cars idle at train crossings.

    Search for hypermilers…it’s quite possible to get well above the manufacturer’s mileage for a gas engine. Close to 60mpg in a regular gas honda accord for example.

  49. kat on June 16, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    Our 2001 Prius has almost 308,000 km on it. We’ve had fewer repairs on it than we’ve required on our 2003 Dodge Dakota. And trust me, it gets a heck of a lot less wear, due to the cost of driving.

    When we bought the Prius in 2001, the naysayers were spouting “You don’t save any money unless the price of gas passes $1/litre”. Shortly after buying it, the price of gas skyrocketed (!) to 81.5/litre (May 15, 2001)

    Yes, if the hybrid battery goes, it’s $4000. but I’m interested in seeing how long of a ride we can get out of her.

  50. Texas Independent on June 16, 2008 at 8:13 pm

    I think this analysis is a bit flawed, I have an Acura that’s paid for with only 120,000 miles, hence, I see no need to buy a hybrid right now. But for my next car, it will be a hybrid. I have a friend that owns a Civic Hybrid and when it was in the shop (accident) for repairs he was given a corolla as a loner car and he complained for 2 weeks about the gas cost. I think the cost will come down and the gas price will continue to rise, making the hybrids even more attractive.

    The way for us in America to make an impact is to reduce our use of oil. As the speculation about the increase use by India nd China does not add up. We in the U.S. needs to conserve, India a country of 1.3 billion uses 2 million barrels a day, the U.S. a country of 3.8 milion uses 23 million barrels a day.

    I we conserve and can reduce our use by 20% (4.6 million barrels a day), the impact will send a message.

    We need to stop driving around the mall parking lot for 10 minutes to find a closer spot that’s about 20 feet closer to the mall. Spend 5 minutes in the drive thru line, I know when my sister is in the car with the baby the drive thru is a great convience but how many times do we see one or two adults in the car at the drive thru, there are so many ways to save and we will have to fight the urges to get ourselves off this addiction and send a message. I am as guilty as the rest of my country of these practices, I am no way excluding myself.

  51. Cannon_fodder on June 17, 2008 at 10:04 am

    I know the # of diesel models is still slim in Canada, but I think it should be a hybrid vs. diesel vs. gasoline vehicle comparison.

    I was just speaking with a person from the Netherlands and another from South Africa and we all remarked how diesel used to be so much cheaper than gasoline but it now is more expensive (in all 3 countries). I could only hypothesize that it is demand-driven. There must be more demand for diesel fuel now than in the 90’s and whether it is in Europe where diesels are much more popular or in NA where they have a bad reputation, the result is the same – everywhere diesel fuel has risen faster than the cost of gasoline.

    I’d seriously consider a diesel vehicle for my next purchase – if it were up to me.

  52. Mike the Muffin on June 19, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    Check out the Vancouver Sun article in Wednesday, June 18, 2008, at

  53. Rob on June 24, 2008 at 6:52 pm

    I totally agree that hybrids are not worth the extra money. Especially when you consider the idea that hybrid batteries are only expected to last 6-10 years. They will then need to be replaced at $3000 – $5000, not too mention that the resale value of an older hybrid will significantly depreciate as nobody will want an older hybrid for fear of replacing those costly batteries. Add these figures into the higher starting prices and they are really a poor investment. A diesel powered car would be a much better investment in the long run.

  54. John Loch on July 6, 2008 at 10:49 pm

    As I read this and make the necessary calculations, you are assuming ~ 20,000 kms being driven / year (i.e. 12 litre/100 km = 13 km/litre; multiply the # of “L/yr” by 13 and you get 20,000). If I understand your overall approach, if one drives 40,000 kms/year, it would take ½ of the “years to payback” that you are showing. The other thing you are doing is simply averaging city & highway ‘mileage’ without weighting one versus the other thereby assuming 50:50 distribution between the two. That isn’t the case for many people, certainly not me. I am not sure how this would bias your analysis but I think that it would further reduce the “payback time”.

    So, I think his analysis isn’t necessarily that relevant to people like me who drive on the highway a lot more than in the city and also drive a lot more than 20,000 kms/year (actually twice that).

    I further wonder why you felt that the depreciation rate would be greater for hybrids and also why you felt there would be more depreciation for hybrids.

  55. FrugalTrader on July 6, 2008 at 11:34 pm

    Hey John, thanks for stopping by. It’s very difficult to please every, so I took the average of city and highway driving. If someone is doing primarily highway driving, then the gap between the hybrids and gasoline versions were be even greater as hybrid fuel economy typically decreases with highway driving.

    I estimate that hybrid depreciation is high because of the battery and hybrid system cost. From the comments above, once the hybrid battery dies (it eventually will), it will cost thousands to replace.

  56. kyler on July 7, 2008 at 12:12 am

    Sorry but I didn’t get through all the posts — yet i have a burning question or 2 for the masses.

    ONe, is there a concern with the useful life of batteries in cars like the Prius ( that could affect its resale value past say 5 yrs ) ?

    Secondly, is there any time when it makes sense to lease a HYBRID car like the Prius for personal use ( ie not being able to write off lease payments ) ?

  57. paul s on July 7, 2008 at 12:12 am

    FT…Not only do hybrid’s costs too much, their “value” as green cars is questionable too, if you look at “dust to dust” analysis.

    http://www.cnwmr. com

  58. Assibatzen on July 7, 2008 at 1:11 am

    hi there,

    very good point paul s. that’s what i was thinking. hybrid cars aren’t really green, they just use less gas. the manufacturing of the hybrid unit, battery, etc might be bad for the environment as well. some people think hybrids run on love and hot air, but they use gas too and they’re blowing out co2. just like every other car. it’s the same with electric cars just because there aren’t any exhaust coming out of it, it doesn’t mean that they are green. electric energy is still generated by coal burning plant.
    sorry i’m biased here – i think it’s good to get a good import car like vw and drive it smart. don’t drag race at the traffic light, no drive thrus, look ahead, don’t break as much!

  59. Potato on July 8, 2008 at 11:42 pm

    Paul S, that’s pretty weak. There’s at least 3 or 4 other long-debunked myths you could be spewing. This is a Canadian blog, why not dredge up the Sudbury thing? I’m sure that’d go over like a nickel balloon. If you don’t want to make up your own FUD, you can do a Google search for debunked myths, or see the summary “Hybrid Cars: The Benefit of My Research“. For the CNW…thing…, see

    #59: Electric cars, even when powered by coal, put out less CO2 due to the efficiencies of the electric motor and the efficiencies of a large centralized plant vs small internal combustion engines. Even if it were a wash, there are definite smog/asthma benefits to not having each car haul a smokestack right into the heart of our downtowns and then sit there and idle in traffic.

    Kyler: I can’t answer your lease question. The battery question unfortunately doesn’t have a hugely satisfactory answer: we don’t know for sure. We DO know that the batteries are good for over 500,000 km of mileage. They seem to last as far as you care to drive them. We don’t know however if the batteries have some kind of decay over time whether they’re used or not. They’re warrantied for 8 years/160,000 km, and we’re just past 10 years of real-world data with the first generation of batteries, and almost 5 years with second-generation batteries. The time-based lifespan appears to be at least 15 years, probably 20-30. The failure rate on first-generation batteries is somewhere around 1% I believe. There are isolated reports of second-generation batteries failing, but so far most are in some way related to abuse (overheating/forced overdischarge/collision); even then the reported failure rate is 0.003%

  60. a.k. on July 23, 2008 at 9:40 am

    You prius drivers are VERY biased as well. Sorry, some people here don’t take your vehicle too seriously. PRIUS were and are being manufactured and sold WHILE VIOLATING AN INTERNATIONAL PATENT by Antonov Automotive. The person behind the magiCk is not getting a penny of toyota profits.
    Someone explain me now why you chose to pay them so much premium for an over-hyped car with questionable milage and treehugging claims. Haven’t they already screwed someone in the very beginning? Guess who is next.

    BATTERY: -heavy.
    -toxic (sealed or not, one day you recycle it).
    -efficiency and capacity decreases over
    time, just like in your cell phone battery.

    MAINTENANCE: -expensive.
    -complicated and specialized.

    ENGINE: -high revving and running all by itself on a highway.

    DRIVETRAIN: -stolen.

    BODY: +very low air drag coefficient.
    -heavy for its dimensions.

    And one thing also, you want to save the nature, – just don’t have more than two children and use public transportation. So next time i zip by in my lightweight turbocharged ride, i want to see your pseudo-intelligent Prius face expressions gone.

  61. Peter on July 23, 2008 at 10:28 pm

    Although the comparison is good it does not reflect the real life. People buy cars for more reasons than cost. It is a good guide for someone who considers the cost #1 issue.
    In case of Prius in particular it can not be compared to Corolla. Prius is a much better car in every respect, design, looks, handling you name it. It is simply few grades above Carolla, which by the way is a cheap ride if you ask me. So if you buy Prius as a fine car with excellent millage then it may not take any time to recover the cost,. This car is as good and as classy as any car costing the same or even few thousands more. From that pint of view it is the best hybrid on the market no doubt. Those cars that are just hybrid versions of “regular” can be compared and one can decide on that basis if they want to. The “smart” car companies will build hybrids and other alternative cars that are completely unique not versions of the same old same old. Toyota got it right with Prus from the very begining.
    Personally I would not by any hybrid that is a version of the “regular”: one. What is the point?

  62. jamie on September 25, 2008 at 10:36 pm

    The prius is 21500.00 not the 32,000 as stated. It wont take no 13 years but at the current gas rate it will only will take 1.5 years to make up the difference in the gas savings with is 20.00 per tank of gas

  63. craig on October 8, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    What if gas increases another 250% over the next 10 years again though?

  64. truth'd on November 5, 2008 at 6:49 am

    :: 6 years to get costs back on a hybrid. Around 8-10 years life on a battery that costs $4-7000 — no economic sense (and NO, prices of batteries never go down over time.)

    :: Total carbon footprint of hybrids currently offset environmental benefits. Environmental benefits don’t seem justified unless they’re getting over 100+mpg..

    :::: Hybrids are a beautiful idea, but not economically or scientifically smart YET. (I smell big oil stalling things still.. help us Obama – you’re our last hope.)

    Buy a gas car and buy $20 of carbon offset credits a year for equal environmental impact… don’t forget to put the sticker on your car so you can feel proud. Better — buy a good diesel for overall fuel value, affordable longevity, and footprint.

  65. Chris on December 10, 2008 at 8:18 pm

    I am a proud owner of a 2008 Honda Civic Hybrid. First off, this graph is flawed due to the fact that it is using EPA MPG numbers as the standard for the calculations. I get 15-30mpg MORE than the sticker says I should (depending on temperature). I commute 75 miles daily, utilizing a little more than a gallon a day….huge savings over the small truck I used to have.

    As far as how quickly one recoups the ‘extra’ cost of the hybrid, solely depends on the DRIVER, not the car. Prior to this purchase I did my research regarding MPG, features, etc., not considering recouping any costs later. Honestly it wasn’t a factor what-so-ever. However for those of you that find this to be a factor, do research regarding hypermiling. It took me a tank or two to get effective at it, but it works. I now only fill my 12 gallon tank twice monthly, versus the 17 gallons 6 times monthly in a 4 cylinder 5 speed pick-up on the exact same commute.

    The oil changes for my HCH II are a lot more expensive, $10 per quart of oil, but only needs to be changed approximately every 9k miles. In the long run, savings over other straight fuel engines.

    Just my $.02. Plan on having this car for the next ten years (10 year all inclusive warranty), and it will pay for itself several times over.

  66. Chris on December 10, 2008 at 8:23 pm

    Noticed a few posts leaning towards diesel versus hybrid as far as fuel/car savings. Perhaps….but the environmental costs are staggering! Diesel is so filthy and damaging. Get a hybrid or electric, save our planet, not your wallet!

  67. Scott on December 10, 2008 at 9:01 pm

    @ Chris — it’s a losing battle. People will ALWAYS put themselves (and their immediate circle) before ‘The Planet’. Period. It’s part of our DNA: self-preservation. In this day and age, that equates to having money to spend on food, gas, heat, mortgage, kid’s clothing, etc. etc. etc. People will only care about The Planet once all their need/wants are fulfilled. That’s the way we humans are. We also like loud motors and thing that go vroom.

    (As a side note, that is exactly why the ‘quiet’ leaf blower has never gained a substantial market share — people don’t believe it works as well because it’s not making a loud combustion engine noise!)

    I read an article many years ago about a visitor to this country (I think from some Asian country). He was completely stunned at the sheer number of cars driving around with only ONE occupant! Exactly. We have far, far, far too many vehicles than we actually need. In Vancouver the HOV lanes had to be reduced from 3 people to 2 because no-one was using them! Two people is ‘high occupancy’?!?

    There is much more to do, vehicle wise, to save the planet than just choosing a hybrid. It requires a paradigm shift in personal, cultural, and societal mentality. Think that will ever happen in your lifetime?

  68. momma on December 16, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    “(As a side note, that is exactly why the ‘quiet’ leaf blower has never gained a substantial market share — people don’t believe it works as well because it’s not making a loud combustion engine noise!)”

    That’s terrible. (A rake is a quieter and better exercise.)

    I hope we learn to vote with our wallets: buy organic and free range eggs etc. People are looking to Obama to help build the infrastructure that will make many of our dreams for greener planet a reality. If the will is there we’ll reach the tipping point soon enough.

  69. The Financial Nut on February 11, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    Interesting remarks. Thanks for sharing.

  70. Maxtron on February 28, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    As I’m seeing it, prices have gone quite a bit, especially in this economy, everybody is fighting for buyers. For example, Honda civic hybrid sedan (basic) is now selling for 27 350$ Seems like we’re getting there. The price of gasoline as lowered but if we expect oil to go up in the next 5 years this seems like it would be a good time for buying hybrid. (if you have the money ;) )

  71. DelCid on April 22, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    Fuel economy. Realize no one gets the numbers posted on new car window stickers. The average driver only gets about 75% of what’s been promised. And that includes hybrid cars. But hybrids still get much better mileage than conventional gasoline vehicles. Smaller four cylinder models are the only gas cars that come close to hybrids in fuel economy.

  72. Sampson on April 22, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    Low sulphur diesel, and particulate filters are going a long way to change how ‘dirty’ buring diesel is. Certainly it is still a fossil fuel, but as someone else pointed out, most of our electricity is generated from fossil fuels also.

    Electric powered cars are obviously the way to go. Now that its been shown that they can produce exceptional power (see the Tesla), batteries are lighter than every, and plug in technology is coming to fruition, soon we should be able to put some solar panels on our roofs (that’s online too!).

    We’ll just have to wait and see how strong a hold the oil industry has on our world… ;)

  73. Colourful Money on May 2, 2009 at 7:20 am

    Superb article that I think sheds some light on the debate! I’ve linked to you at under Featured Articles. Gotta get this valuable piece of information out there! =)

  74. Daniel Howard on May 28, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    Hi. You missed the Creative Commons attribution on that photo.


  75. kamran shahkohi on October 12, 2009 at 11:57 pm

    after all, electric vehicles are the best values and will have the most efficiency and best resell values.
    Kamran Shahkohi
    Great Neck NY

  76. David in Ottawa on February 21, 2010 at 11:37 am

    Hi – this article is somewhat misleading. 1. There are LESS maintainance costs for hybrids 2. They depreciate LESS than counterparts 3. This comparison is against the base model and hybrid standard features are more rich than base models.

    I own a Ford Escape Hybrid. I bought in 2008 for $30,500 plus tax and recieved $4000 in rebates($2K from prov, $2K from feds). My loan is prime plus 1% which is 3.25% today.

    Oil changes are required only once every 12,000kms vs 6,000kms for standard model (on account of fact car runs in electric mode and electric motor assists when engine runs). Brakes also requires less service due to regenerative braking which reduces stress on brakes. Next time you are in Vancouver ask a cabby running a prius about their maintaince and fuel costs – they will tell you far less than reg vehicle.

    Check auto trader – hybrids retain value far better than counterparts.

    Check manufacture websites – my base hybrid came with options only found on more expensive non-hybrid models. Comparing apples to apples and you will find the price differencial far less than you might think.

    Honda Civic is worst value – doesn’t go into electric mode and your milage will not be as good as you would expect. Right now Ford Fusion Hybrid and Prius are best deals. Escape Hybrid overpriced.

    Hope this helps.

  77. Andrew on June 28, 2010 at 5:46 am

    Not to mention that these hybrid vehicles have a larger lifetime carbon footprint than most regular cars. The Prius has a larger carbon footprint than a Hummer H3.
    The complexities of manufacturing and the waste created when done with the car should make this obvious to most people.

  78. Sam on November 3, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    Maybe this article needs to be revised to reflect 2010/2011 prices and new models on the horizon ;-)

  79. Jeff on March 30, 2011 at 3:28 pm

    There are a couple of issues I have with this analysis. First, as many have already commented, comparing the Prius to the Corolla is not fair. I own a Prius, and from a luxury, size and feature standpoint, I would not have bought a Corolla. The more likely candidate is the Camry.

    Secondly, gasoline engine cars RARELY achieve anything close to the mileage ratings posted. Having owned a Prius for nearly three years I can say that in summer driving conditions I can routinely achieve 4.5 – 4.6 L/100km. My model year is rated at 4.5 L/100 km. I also own a Mazda 5, which is rated city/highway combined somwhere around 8 L/100km (sorry, the exact number eludes me), but I have been tracking my mileage and I am realizing between 10 – 12 L/100 km in the winter, and between 9 – 10 L/100km in the summer.

    It doesn’t seem like much, but the difference between 4.6 and 4.1 L/100 km is over 100 km in driving distance.

  80. nelson raver on March 25, 2012 at 4:07 pm

    I own a 2008 Prius and another manufacturer brand all gasoline driven auto, equivelant in class size and weight to the Prius. THE PRIUS WINS!
    The above and many other surveys comparison is using the highest number for MPG and is test study only; not a longevity comparison. In reality, most gasoline engines actual MPG is nearest to the LOW end which is much lower than the Prius. Ex. The 2012 Ford Fusion rating is 28-40 mpg and the 2012 Prius is rated at 48-50. Most of the time, the Ford Focus median MPG will be close to 37. The Prius Median MPG for my 2008 has been 46. My Prius cost $26,500 with package 2, touring package, tax, etc. and has more features than the 2012 Focus; such as the rear view camera and security system.
    Prius wins: No comparison!

  81. chance on March 27, 2012 at 3:54 pm

    For all you hybrid people out there, i want to to realize that hyribs may get better gas mileage, but realize that since the U.S. doesnt have the intellegence yet to make batteries cheaper, and hold more, 99% of the hybrids will be sold in foreign countries.also for car people like me, hybrids dont have balls , so why would i try to drag race with a piece of crap car that acn’t do crap on the road

  82. David on September 7, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    The Hyundai Sonata Hybrid has such a small price premium, it may be advantageous to add this to your above list for a comparison ($5,000 in comparison to the Sonata base model). This would pay off much faster (without looking at the math portion).

  83. Michael Kohn on September 26, 2012 at 8:10 am

    I know that the article should be updated but my opinion it is the same as 2008.

    Hybrid vehicles are the future but not the present.
    I suggest them to who has money to invest and also drives several miles a day.
    Some people could never get back enough money based on their car usage.

    Hybrid cars keep their value but it also more difficult to get a discount when you buy a new ones

  84. P L Wolstenholme on October 26, 2012 at 9:02 pm

    If you drive lots of km in a year for business, you really should give the Toyota Prius serious consideration.

    My wife is a realtor and drives 35,000 to 40,000 km a year in town. Her 2004 Prius racked up 290,000 km before we sold it for $5,000. The offsetting income tax for the business mileage worked out to a recovery of about $15,000 per year, we figure it paid for its capital cost in about 32 months. Thereafter that mileage claim value was a real bonus.

    Of course maintenance, insurance and fuel cost about $5,400 a year. Gas mileage ran an average of 5.5 l/100 km or 50 mpg in town.

    Our new Prius C Premium (smaller but just as well equipped) is proving to be even more miserly on gas and will earn us a faster payback because prices are lower.

    There’s no doubt that if you drive lots of business km in a year a Prius is a great value/ Besides it’s a very comfortable, well equipped car

  85. t on June 30, 2014 at 4:29 pm

    Chevy Volt may be the vehicle that is worth it !

    I have been tracking my vehicle costs using a self made spreadsheet for about 15 years. It includes any vehicle I have owned or thought about owning.

    I use the original cost, resale, # of yrs, gas, maint, insurance , interest costs, and a few other factors to come out with a true monthly cost of each vehicle.

    Not surprisingly used vehicles are always better even with higher repair costs. New vehicles are OK as well as long as you keep them for over 7 years. Under $2500 known reliable beaters are among the least expensive to run as long as you when to fix and when to dump.

    What is shocking to me is that the numbers i run on many on used chevy volts actually are inverse. Using my method a chevy volt will actually pay you a monthly amount if you have a daily commute of 50 – 100 km.

    I would buy one asap but they only seat 4 and we have 5.

    I’m still considering it though as 80% of the time we only have 1-3 people in the vehicle.

    Comments ?

  86. Economizer on June 30, 2014 at 11:23 pm

    I would say that the Tesla has the best value for the money. With a guaranteed buyback (is Elon still doing this?) there’s $0 on repairs or lease/finance payment except the interest.
    It has the most efficient (given value per kms or mile if you’re American).
    It has 480kms/~$6-7 charge. This makes the Volts 61kms range look silly and impractical.


  87. Len on July 4, 2014 at 7:25 pm

    the other point you did not check on is the difference in the cost of insurance between the cars.
    Also for me resale on a Hybrid after 5 yrs is not going to be good

  88. Rebecca on September 19, 2014 at 12:25 pm

    My issue with hybrids is that no one talks about battery replacement. We all know that batteries don’t last forever and they get less efficient the longer we use them. So, what happens after perhaps 5 years when you need replace the batteries? How much does that cost? How do you dispose of them? And what about the cost of the electricity to charge your car? I don’t believe the savings are as high as people would like to believe.

  89. Jeff on September 19, 2014 at 1:29 pm


    My Prius is now 6 years old and the battery is still going strong. Keep in mind that with any Hybrid vehicle, it’s not a single battery but an array of many batteries. So if one fails, the others are still operational. From my own research, a battery pack replacement would cost $3,000 – $4,000 – certainly not cheap, but a far cry from the outrageous claims of $15,000 many were claiming. Research I did before I purchased my Prius showed that Taxi drivers put about 400,000 km (~250K mi) on a Prius before retiring them, and they seldom needed battery pack replacement. The likelihood of needing it done is rare, and Toyota warrants the entire hybrid system for 8 years or 160,000 km. Battery shouldn’t be an issue for vast majority of hybrid owners.

    There is the issue of disposal… older models (mine included) used NiMH batteries which are toxic to recycle. The newer models are now using Lithium Ion batteries which are fully recyclable, meaning that there is a known limit of NiMH batteries that will eventually be recycled. Like any new technology, it gets better as it matures.

    Mine is not a plugin, so there’s no cost of electricity to factor in for me, but it would vary depending on your local electricity rates. My research has shown that it’s currently still cheaper than the price of gasoline. This could change over time as demand increases, but its no different than reliance on oil — its demand continues to increase, and prices continue to rise.

    Fuel costs for me have worked out to less than $1,000 CAD (~ $900 USD) / year. That’s commuting every day about 60km (~35 miles) – factoring in weekend trips, about 20,000 km / year (~12K miles)

    For me the savings is very real. My Prius costs me less than half of what my Mazda 5 does which gets used about the same amount. The cost of the car to purchase was about the same as my Mazda 5 as well, so all things being equal, in my experience hybrid vehicles are already definitely worth it, and they will only continue to improve as the technology matures.

  90. DLANCELOT on September 19, 2014 at 2:12 pm

    Answer for the Tesla S model is here:

    The free charge offer now only has the up front cost of the car (with the extended warranty), and, whether a person lives near a supercharging station.

    And, can the person afford the premium price of the premium vehicle or not.

  91. David on September 19, 2014 at 2:30 pm


    I suppose talking about replacing batteries is a lot like giving an fuel based engine an overhaul when it’s burning oil…a lot of people don’t bother (even though that is lowering their mileage).

    Inversely related on electric cars, a person who is particular and will notice that their range has slowly diminished from when it was new (they tracked it), and it drops 10-50 miles, they may want to replace the battery pack for the cost because mileage is more important to them than the cost (and by then, as Jeff has said, the technology may be drastically different).
    People don’t replace their drive train because the new one has better mileage, most people don’t keep on top of those developments. In fact, most people don’t know there are vehicles like the Mazda skyactiv technology that gets around 1200 kms on a $70CAD tank!

    We have a 2013 Honda Accord 2DR V6, and a 2010 Toyota Prius in my household, both fun to drive, the Prius gets about double the mileage (for the price to fill the tank). For me (Honda Accord V6), I spend about $300/month on fuel. If I was driving a Prius, $150. Being the Prius and Accord are around the same purchase price, this is a no brainer for someone who doesn’t care about the “fun factor” of driving.

    Now, for someone who loves the “fun factor” or “cool factor”, the Tesla S performance edition at $130,000CAD (delivered to my door in Calgary from Vancouver), it costs about $32 for the same mileage of the other two vehicles and it drives like a $180,000 sports car, and, it’s a 4 door!, so, with all that in consideration, if a person can afford it, it occurs like the far superior choice (if we’re just looking at fuel costs; don’t forget the regular service visits to the dealerships that’s no longer required as it doesn’t have an engine or transmission ;-).

  92. David on September 19, 2014 at 2:33 pm

    The Tesla S edition is also free to fill at the supercharger stations for people that live near them (1 in or around Banff, and north of Calgary to be built in 2015).

  93. think big on October 29, 2014 at 1:31 pm

    A couple comments on the “green” aspect…

    1) Think cradle-to-grave. While you’re using the car, you’re polluting less. But the production, transportation of, and disposal of the car after your possession are polluting more. It’s pretty much impossible to know how this balances out. It’s not fun to think about but shouldn’t be ignored. “I just buy rhino horn, I don’t kill rhinos.”

    1) In order for a hybrid to give a significant reduction in pollution, you have to be a major polluter in the first place! If environment is important to you, you won’t be putting over 20k km/yr on a car. Very rarely do people “need” to drive that much, it’s just a matter of the level of convenience and comfort living you want. Of course, any small effort to pollute less is still better than none.

  94. Student that needs HELP on April 24, 2016 at 9:42 pm

    What is the Gasoline cost per gallon of the Camry LE and Camry Hybrid?
    I need to know this by tomorrow if at all possible.

  95. David on April 25, 2016 at 12:00 pm

    Tesla 3, end of thread. This conversation will no longer be valid as of 2017.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.