It was impossible to get a conversation going; everybody was talking too much.” – Yogi Berra

In 1996, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan coined the term “irrational exuberance” to describe what he felt was unjustified speculation in the stock market as the S&P 500 rose past 744. Now, 12 years later, the S&P500 has moved past 744 again, this time on the way down in what may be another case of irrational markets. Do we now have “irrational pessimism”?

We have talked to literally thousands of people in the last few months and found it amazing how unanimous everyone’s outlook is now. “It will get worse in 2009”, “It will take 3-5 or even 10 years or more to recover”, and “it is the worst since the Great Depression”. Doomsday scenarios are also common. Pessimism is everywhere!

The argument that this pessimism is justified is everywhere in the news. Here are the reasons why it may be “irrational pessimism”.

When you look at the economy, however, all the pessimism is hard to understand. An advisor to John F. Kennedy created the “Misery Index” to gauge the pain of an economic crisis. It simply adds unemployment rate and inflation. By this measure, we are now only at 7.6% which is nowhere close to the recessions of the 70s and 80s when it was 22% and 19.9%.

In fact, despite all the bad news, the US economy is holding up better than these other recessions by all the main economic stats:

2008-2009 1981-1982 1973-1975
Real GDP -1.1% -2.7% -3.1%
Industrial Production -6.1% -9.9% -13%
Unemployment 7.6% 10.8% 9.0%
Inflation -0.1% 14.6% 12.2%
30 Year Mortgage 5.2% 18.5% 10.0%
Misery Index 7.6% 22.0% 19.9%
S&P500 -45% to -50% -13% -43%
TSX -40% to -45% -39% -35%

* New York Post

This recession is, of course, not over yet and may deepen, but none of these statistics are expected to get as bad as the prior recessions. An average of 55 forecasters in the January 15 Wall Street Journal survey expect real GDP to eventually reach only -2.1%. Industrial production appears to have bottomed in September 2008. The news is full of stories of massive lay-offs, but unemployment is only expected to rise to 8.9%.

The main driver of the economy is still consumer spending, which rose 3.6% in 2008. It fell sharply in the last quarter, but rebounding early in 2009. Other than the last quarter of 2008, consumers held up fine with high oil prices (though it did hurt car sales), falling house prices, and tightened credit markets.

In short, the economy is in an ordinary recession. The economy needs to pause to clear off over-building. Far too many houses had been built, so new construction has slowed to clear these off. The current level of auto production would take 27 years to replace all cars, so demand will come back. The economy is not the problem.

So, how do you explain the stock market having its worst year in history (other than during the 1930s)? The crash is more surprising, since there are no good alternatives. In 1982, not only was the economy worse than now, you could buy a GIC at 19 7/8%, and yet the stock market still fell less than today and recovered in one year.

There are real reasons why the stock market crash has been larger:

  1. It was exaggerated by the popping of 4 bubbles at once – real estate, oil/commodities, China (BRIC countries) and a debt/financial bubble. Four more cases of irrational exuberance! Not surprisingly, the market problems have been mainly in the same 4 sectors.
  2. The banking crisis created fear among consumers, made it harder to get credit, and took the entire financial index down 80%.
  3. The recession is global (like 1973-74).

Do these reasons justify the current pessimism?

  • The 4 bubble sectors have probably deflated fully – and probably more – except for real estate, which has a bit more to fall, especially in the U.S.
  • The US financial index is down 80%, so there is not much more room to fall. This despite the worst banks, Citibank and Bank of America, both making profits again in 2009.

Is the fear and constant bad news now out of control?  Everyone is wondering how bad the economy could get and when it will recover, but the economy is not the problem.  Everyone is wondering how low the stock market will get, while trillions of dollars sit in cash on the sidelines waiting for the right time to jump back in.  The media is also full of ridiculous comparisons to the Great Depression.

Has “irrational pessimism” become the latest bubble?  If so, then just like the last 4 bubbles, you can never predict how far irrational bubbles will go, but they all eventually pop. This time, it would need a “melt up”, not a “melt down”.

MDJ readers are well-read. What do you think? Do we now have “irrational pessimism”?

Ed Rempel is a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) and Certified Management Accountant (CMA) who built his practice by providing his clients solid, comprehensive financial plans and personal coaching.  If you would like to contact Ed, you can leave a comment in this post, or visit his website  You can read his other articles here.


  1. Victor on May 27, 2009 at 4:01 am

    I would feel a lot better about this rally if I could explain it.

    I still look around and see friends losing jobs. Unemployment in Canada is at 8%. Inflation is at 0.4%. Food prices are still rising. The prime lending rate is 2.25%, the lowest in Canadian history. Variable rate mortgages are at 3%. Two months ago the DOW fell faster than it did during the Great Depression, and in January investors panicked as British banks announced huge losses. The full effects of printed money have not been felt yet I believe. This must eventually result in inflation as dollars are devalued.

    So why the market rally? What real-world, concrete, positive news do we have to explain this?

  2. Ed Rempel on May 28, 2009 at 9:51 pm

    Hi Victor,

    The markets don’t work that way. All the bad news you mentioned is already widely know, so it is built into current prices and cannot be expected to move markets.

    Bad economic stats are irrelevant, unless they are worse than the general expectation. Very bad news that is only slightly less bad than expected makes markets rise. Therefore,, no good news is necessary to make markets rise – just the general expectations need to become slightly less bad.

    The full effects of printed money causing inflation obviously have not been felt yet, but the fear of inflation is rampant, even though it is a minimum of a year away. The fear of inflation built into current prices is likely far more than the actual likelihood.

    Unemployment is a lagging factor. In a normal recession, unemployment keeps rising even after the economy is recovering. Economists are only anticipating unemployment to rise about 2-3% – from about 7% to about 9-10%.

    Meanwhile, the stock market is a leading indicator and usually rises 6-9 months before the economy bottoms. So, having the market rise for a 12-18 months before unemployment turns around is the normal expectation.

    We think think the market level in early March was just stupid. The rally so far has just been sanity returning after over-shooting on the downside. I don’t know who was selling in early March, but it was obviously investors that focus on trends, and not on normalized valuations.


  3. Ed Rempel on March 9, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    Happy anniversary, everyone!

    We are now 2 full years into the current bull market! It’s strange how many people STILL don’t see it.


  4. WittyArtist on June 2, 2011 at 7:21 am

    What I don’t like about this crisis and “irrational pessimism” is that the mass media pops up mainly the bad parts. What’s positive is very little mentioned. We should try build a healthier mentality, an optimistic one. No matter how few are the positive aspects, gathering them all and constantly care for them, we can succeed.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.